There is nothing wrong with being the person who chats back in seconds. It's just a personal way of communication and respect for others. However, sometimes replying to messages too frequently may make people feel stressed and upset, so the following points should be taken into consideration when replying to messages:
1. Appropriate delay in reply: Sometimes it may make people feel pressured to reply immediately, and it may make people feel more comfortable and comfortable to delay reply appropriately.
2. For different communication modes: the appropriate response time may be different in different social platforms or communication modes. For example, in instant messaging, second replies may be more appropriate, but in email or text messages, longer replies may be more common.
3. Consider the other party's situation: When replying to messages, you should consider the other party's situation and feelings. If the other party is busy or has some emergencies, you should delay the reply appropriately to avoid disturbing the other party's work or life.
There is nothing wrong with being the person who chats back in seconds. As long as you take into account the other party's situation and feelings when replying to messages, and appropriately delay the reply, you can avoid unnecessary pressure and trouble to the other party.
The reason why people who return every second are not treasured is that such people usually take the initiative to pursue others and naturally pay more. And people may not like him, so it is understandable that he is not treasured.
The person who returns information in seconds will not be treasured. Just like in love, I think love is paid by both parties. If only one party pays, and the other party just continuously accepts, is this kind of love love? Isn't this a dog licking in disguise? Maybe someone will say, "How nice it is to return in a second, so that the other party can get a reply at the moment of sending, and also make him feel fully cared about.
Second reply has been regarded as VIP treatment in network communication. However, some people wait for the other party's second reply while deliberately delaying the reply. Why on earth? In fact, the second back information will not be treasured. It has scientific basis.
Professor Eric Klinenberg of New York University said that if experimental animals press the lever, they can get food every time they press it, and the frequency of pressing the lever will gradually decrease; On the contrary, if the frequency of food supply is reduced, they will actively press the lever, and then their dopamine level will also rise, which makes them feel excited.
Is every second of feedback a sign of low value and flattering personality?
There are a thousand Hamlets with a thousand readers, so how do you understand each time you return a message? After all, "different people have different opinions, and the wise have different opinions". Therefore, I personally think that every second message is not a low value and flattering personality. It is a manifestation of high quality and independent personality.
Some people send a circle of friends, and friends around them praise them at the first time. High quality people will feel that others' behavior is very warm, while some people have an idea in mind that the first time you praise is to please yourself, so as to achieve some goal. I think this is more narrow, and it is doomed to not go far in life.
People who are good at knowledge, recuperation and other aspects often know more about etiquette, and the second they return information is more about their behavior and recuperation than the so-called low value. Many highly valued people pay more attention to these things. Otherwise, many large companies would not make an appointment in advance, nor would they carry out their work in disorder. And the efficiency of handling things is even more amazing? Is this also the withdrawal of low value?
Personally, do you think the second message is a high-value withdrawal? It means that people are strict with themselves and treat them equally, and they will not be late to return information for some reason. There are many low value people who read other people's news and deliberately reply a few minutes later, for fear of appearing too idle and lowering their level and identity. In fact, I'm sure not. On the contrary, those who do not reply to the news will not only delay important events, which can show that the person's taste and quality are really not good.
Everyone has his own things to do, and the people who reply to the news every second are the busiest people, because successful people are more efficient and honest. So don't treat people's quality as low value!
