In today's society, there are many smart people, but there are not many honest people with excellent moral character. Therefore, the leader values not only a person's ability, but also the person's conduct, the villain in the workplace is more popular than the honest person, which is also a reality, the villain will always ignore the interests of others, mercenary, low-level strategy, to achieve their own ulterior purposes, often gain power. Honest people are more kind-hearted, and they don't think about playing crooked, treating people honestly, being kind, and dealing with them naturally, but a villain who is as cunning as a fox can only always face reality and bow to the wind.
The relationship between the leader is very delicate, and he may understand you through his usual observations, and even more so through the report of the section chief. If you offend the section chief, and you don't have enough qualifications, you will probably die a miserable death, and you will fight in meetings and drinking fields. And it's hard to reverse. If the section chief says hello in front of the leader, of course your life will be much better. Usually report more, and often joke and praise yourself when necessary, as a way to show your best efforts in your work. Honest people are not good at banquet diplomacy, and it doesn't matter, don't force it, so as not to make mistakes. Don't be fooled by some people's "accompaniment" or something, you are just a small role, after a circle of leaders to return to the circle of salute and complete the task, you can leave the seat to call, and leave other things to them to do.
Therefore, in the workplace, you must not only become a person with outstanding ability, but also a person with excellent conduct, so that you will get more opportunities than ordinary people. There is no distinction between villains and honest people in the workplace, there are only positive and negative differences. Most of the people who are popular in the workplace are positive people, and some people who have special relationships may also be popular, but they will not go too far. Positive people are generally willing to unite with their colleagues, at least they are not willing to pay, while negative people are difficult to take care of the overall situation, giving people the impression of being honest people, in fact, to put it bluntly, they are very selfish people, who seem to not hurt others, but never help anyone. The assumption that villains and honest people can seriously affect one's development in the workplace is a manifestation of emotion and does not benefit others or oneself.
In fact, most bosses don't like simple people very much. The word "simple" sounds like a compliment, but in fact it is a derogatory term in the workplace, to put it mildly, the meaning of "simple" at the negotiation table and in the workplace competition is no different from "stupid".
Some people say that leaders don't like smart employees, like stupid employees, here stupid is not simple, but obedient, leaders like those who can be controlled, do not like the kind of employees who are too shrewd, not subject to management. The so-called stupid subordinates are obedient subordinates, which mainly include two meanings: on the one hand, they can do things well, which is a matter of professional and technical ability. At the same time, they are also able to take on some important tasks independently.
On the other hand, whether what he does is in line with the leader's mind is a question of communication with the leader. The second point is particularly important. If a person is particularly capable, but does things against the leader, the leader is unwilling to support his work.
People who are too simple are prone to suffer in the workplace and cannot achieve great things. Simple people are easy to be at a disadvantage in workplace competition, and they are controlled by others, but simple people will soon be no longer pure in the workplace, after all, in order to survive, people must also become cunning.
Leaders should like to be "smart and can't do it" and "not smart and capable" people. Yes and no! is smart and unwilling to do it, in fact, it is also a kind of annoyance. His cleverness determines that he will not be willing to be controlled by others, and he will use gushing words to prove himself right. A person who is not smart but capable can contribute a lot to the company, and he can continue to create value for the company, but at the same time, he will not have some other thoughts.
For simple employees: Leaders generally prefer.
1. Simple employees are relatively simple, it is easy to write their own ideas and needs on their faces or show them in their behaviors, and they can be quickly understood by the leaders, so the leaders can assign work tasks or clarify the direction of training according to the actual situation, after all, no one wants to always guess and figure out the minds of others, let alone their own subordinates.
2. Simple employees are very kind, not utilitarian, and will not only consider their own interests and losses, but will consider the feelings and positions of others with empathy.
Smart people are very easy to be labeled as "will come" by the leader, and at this moment the leader will hand over the management of some important affairs of the elite team to them. For leaders, communicate well with smart people, he can quickly understand his own meaning and complete the task beautifully! When you think of a tradition, the people you envy are not technically excellent, but people who can integrate all kinds of natural resources and connections. If a leader is a leader, he needs to have a mind, an air, and a role. You can bring together all kinds of outstanding smart people, and work together to do something that you can't accomplish yourself, and in the field, the most important thing is real people, and at the same time, those who have the ability will not be real people, don't you think? Leaders must love capable people, and it is better to have strong work ability and good temper, rather than just being a real person. Do you all agree?
For the CEO, no matter what kind of person is recruited, the most important thing is that this person must be able to solve difficulties and create wealth for the enterprise. To do this well, you must be able to understand how to do your job better. Obviously, in this point, smart people have natural superiority, and smart people are good at finding the most suitable way to work, cultivating feelings with the most suitable people, and obtaining the most beneficial resources, which is indispensable to be able to do their jobs better. Really smart people are very clear about the work ability, use value and requirements of each person in the elite team, so they can give different work plans to the real and suitable people, and at the same time will give the other party what he really needs, so as to produce a positive circulation system in the team to ensure that everyone's value is maximized.
On the side of smart people, they want to feel like the business, have a trench with the boss, and assist the boss to contain others, especially the virtuous and capable Jiang, who rarely takes into account the sense of handling things and the overall situation, which is what the boss likes very much. Smart people are bad at doing things too well, far-sighted, insight into people's hearts and the progress of things, which worries the boss, what the boss wants is to grasp everything and not be grasped by others. When the role of smart people is played, they will eventually be bored by the boss, and the boss is unwilling to be too transparent in front of others, so it is also a generation of new people to replace the old feelings. Real people, stupid heads, industrious hands and feet, think less, do more, are very easy to manipulate, and have little resistance. Not only does the boss like it, but everyone also likes it, because it can be a good deal. For the CEO, of course, it is the admiration of good talents, but nowadays, many "pseudo-experts" are very easy to blind the CEO's thinking.
The so-called "pseudo-experts" are the consultants or old ministers that the boss relies on, which causes the company's development to be backward and the road to introducing talents is very unsmooth. Personally, I think that the old man must always be sober to identify outstanding talents, recruit talents, improve the quality of the enterprise talent team, and blindly follow the trend of pursuing the perfect high diploma, so that outstanding talents can give full play to their own value to the greatest extent. If you can get into the CEO's sight, then you must be a charismatic person, and this kind of charm can impress the CEO! This kind of charm may be reflected in your work is very clean, efficient, and half the effort; It may be reflected in your loyal following, climbing through the peak period of work with the merchants, and also experiencing the trough period of the industry together; Maybe it's also manifested in your straightforwardness and unrequited, so that merchants can find his unvirtuous deeds from you anytime and anywhere.
