What should I do if someone in the company rumors about the relationship between men and women? First, let's analyze:
First: He has a grudge against you and wants to ruin your reputation.
Second: He wants to pull you into the water and cook raw rice into rice.
Third: He has a mental problem.
Colleagues of the opposite sex generally keep a certain distance, and male colleagues spread rumors and have an ambiguous relationship with you, which must be related to some of your behaviors, after all, a slap does not make a sound.
Maybe you usually treat this male colleague coldly at work, ridicule him, ridicule him, ridicule him, and even have conflicts and conflicts with him because of work or things outside of work, and basically you have the upper hand. This causes him to be dissatisfied with you, but he can't do anything about you, so he can only use his mouth to spread a rumor for you and discredit you.
Maybe you usually have a good relationship with him, get along more, have more contact, talk about everything, and even include some intimate topics, which creates a certain illusion for him, making him feel that you have a good impression of him and that you have thoughts about him. But you adhered to your bottom line and didn't leave him a chance, so he simply spread rumors everywhere that you had a good relationship with him and had an ambiguous relationship, in fact, he wanted to pull you into the water, confirm your relationship, and force you to comply.
Maybe he has a mental problem.,Fabricate ambiguity between colleagues.,Generally, the protagonist is someone else.,Pinch yourself as the hero.,Don't care about face.,Don't mind what others think.,It's only that he has his own problems.。 In the face of a colleague's rumor-mongering, you should fight back.
You should warn him not to talk nonsense, and if it causes you great trouble, you can sue him for defamation.
You can ask him to clarify, apologize to you, and give you assurances in public, such as at a department meeting, in the presence of your leaders and colleagues.
You can ask your boyfriend or husband to come to your company to pick you up from work or accompany you to company events, and the rumors will be self-defeating.
The most important thing is that you can't tolerate it, you have to be cruel to him, let him know how good you are, only then will he shut up.
If someone spreads rumors about the relationship between men and women, what responsibility should the rumor-mongers bear? There is no crime of rumor-mongering, only defamation'
The crime of defamation refers to the deliberate fabrication and dissemination of fictitious facts, which are sufficient to degrade the personality of others and damage the reputation of others, and the circumstances are serious.
1. Subject matter requirements
The object of this crime is the same as the crime of insult, which is the personal dignity and reputation rights of others. The object of the crime is a natural person.
2. Objective elements
In the objective aspect of the crime, this crime is manifested in the perpetrator's fabrication and dissemination of certain fictitious facts, which are sufficient to degrade the personality and reputation of others, and the circumstances are serious.
(1) There must be an act of fabricating certain facts, that is, the content that slanders others is completely fictitious. If the dissemination is not fabricated out of thin air, but objectively existing facts, even if it is harmful to the personality or reputation of others, it does not constitute this crime, and (2) there must be an act of disseminating fabricated facts. The so-called dissemination is the public diffusion in society. There are basically two ways of dispersion: one is verbal dispersion; The other is text, that is, it is disseminated by means of large-character posters, small-character posters, pictures, newspapers and periodicals, books, letters, etc. The so-called "sufficient to derogatory" refers to fabricated and disseminated false facts that are entirely likely to demean the personality or reputation of others, or have in fact caused actual damage to the victim's personality or reputation. If the dissemination of false facts is not likely to damage the personality or reputation of others, or does not damage the personality or reputation of others, it does not constitute the crime of defamation.
(3) The defamation act must be carried out against a specific person, but it does not have to be named, as long as the victim is known from the content of the defamation, it can constitute the crime of defamation. If the facts disseminated by the perpetrator do not have a specific target and cannot demean a person's personality or reputation, they cannot be punished as defamation.
(4) The act of fabricating facts and slandering others must be serious in order to constitute this crime. If there is an act of fabricating facts to slander others, but it does not reach the level of seriousness, it cannot be punished as this crime. The so-called serious circumstances mainly refer to those who repeatedly fabricate facts to slander others; fabricating facts to cause serious harm to the personality or reputation of others; fabricating facts to slander others, causing a vile impact; Defaming another person causing them to go insane or causing the victim to commit suicide, etc.
3. Main requirements
The subject of this crime is a general subject, and any natural person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity for criminal responsibility can constitute this crime.
4. Subjective elements
The crime must be subjectively intentional, and the perpetrator knows that he or she is disseminating false facts that are sufficient to damage the reputation of others, and knows that his conduct will have a harmful result that harms the reputation of others, and hopes that such a result will occur. The perpetrator's aim was to discredit others. If the perpetrator mistakes a false fact for a true fact and spreads it, or if a false fact is spread without the purpose of damaging the reputation of others, it does not constitute the crime of defamation.
II. Identification
1. The boundary between this crime and public security violations and civil torts
The defamatory act constituting the crime of defamation must be serious, while the defamatory act that violates the administrative regulations of public security must be limited to those that are not sufficient for criminal punishment. Civil acts of defamation infringement are not only less serious than the criminal acts of defamation and the acts of defamation in violation of the administrative regulations of public security, but also have the following differences: (1) The crime of defamation must be disseminated by fabricated and false facts. If the dissemination of objectively existing facts, although it is harmful to the personality and reputation of others, it does not constitute the crime of defamation. However, even if the content is true, as long as the law prohibits public publicity, disclosure will damage the personality and reputation of others, and it can also constitute defamation infringement. Even the more truthful the facts described, the more aggravated the degree of infringement. For example, revealing a person's privacy for the purpose of damaging the reputation of another person, the more realistic the disclosure, the more egregious the infringement will be. According to article 140 of the Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People's Republic of China (for Trial Implementation), a person who divulges or publicizes the privacy of others and has a negative impact on the reputation of others is an act of infringing on the right to reputation and does not constitute the crime of defamation. (2) Legal persons, groups, and organizations cannot be the target of the crime of defamation. In the case of defamation infringement, legal persons, groups, and organizations can be victims. For example, spreading false news about the quality of a factory's products is inferior, with the aim of bringing down the other party by means of unfair competition. Even if such an act causes serious consequences, it can only constitute the crime of damaging the reputation of business and the reputation of goods, but not the crime of defamation. (3) The subjective fault requirements are different. The subjective aspect of the criminal act of defamation must be directly intentional; The subjective fault of defamation infringement includes negligent acts. In addition, even if there are false elements in the report, exposement, or criticism in good faith, it should not be punished as defamation.
2. The boundary between this crime and the crime of insult
The object of the violation of both crimes is the personality and reputation of others. The main differences are:
(1) Insult is not carried out in a fabricated manner, whereas defamation must be a fabrication of facts.
(2) insults contain violent insults, while defamation does not use violent means;
(3) Insults are often made in front of the victim, while defamation is disseminated in public or to a third party.
3. Penalties
Whoever commits this crime shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights.
Those who commit this crime will only be dealt with if they are complained, except where they seriously endanger social order and national interests.
The so-called "handling only after complaining" here refers to the fact that if the crime of defamation is committed and the victim denounces it, the court will accept it, otherwise it will not accept it. "Except where there is a serious endangerment to social order and national interests", for example, where the victim's death is caused by defamation; causing public outrage among the local people; If the victim does not or cannot make a complaint, the people's procuratorate shall initiate a public prosecution if the victim does not or cannot do so.
What should I do if I am slandered by a villain in my unit?
First, stay calm first, don't lose your mind because of other people's words, in real life, in the company, many people will choose to say bad things behind their backs for their own interests, or even make some small reports to the leader. It's a common workplace behavior, and there's no need to make a fuss when a colleague says something bad about you. When we encounter this problem, the first thing is to calm ourselves down, so that we can think calmly and face the problem, and then we can find a solution to the problem. Even if you are a decent gentleman, sometimes, you will be interested in talking about things behind others, say a few words, and when you meet others, you will also say your own opinions, if it is not the kind of topic that denigrates you, you can ignore it; You can also pretend not to know about complaints at work. Because in some cases, there will inevitably be some disagreements in the work. But if you encounter a lot of excessive discussion, you must collect evidence and find an appropriate opportunity to fight back later.
2. Find an opportunity to fight back directly and make him regret that if someone publicly slanders you or insults you, you have to tell him clearly that I am not easy to provoke! The next time you encounter this situation, tell him directly, don't give you the meaning of the leader when you approve, if you have an opinion about me, you can say it directly, if you have an opinion on this decision, you can also say it to me, I can help you react with the leader, there is no need to say these words behind your back. Some people will choreograph you at will, and the more you show the state of "soft persimmon", the more they will become more aggressive, so at critical times, we must be stiff and don't be afraid. The only fear is the fear of being chewed on the root of the tongue behind the back by the villain, and then reaching the ears of the leader, which will leave a bad impression on the leader. So we must also have faith in our leaders. It is only when a person lacks insight and is dull in mind that he can easily be influenced by the "bad words" of others.
3. For behaviors that seriously affect your reputation, you can ask the leader not to simply believe in the words of the pure self-purification, sometimes the spitting stars can drown people, and the wise die from rumors. If you don't make the right sound, it's suppressed by the wrong sound. It is the law of the workplace. If you know that someone is saying bad things about you and hurting your interests, personality and relationships, you have to fight back, otherwise, you won't know how long you will suffer in vain. You can tell your leader that the leader hates the existence of this kind of behavior at work, which destroys the team's ability to work together and destroys the team's ability to work together, and for serious mistakes, we must explain to the leader privately. Second, prove yourself and make the leader believe in you. It's a good idea to ask your leader for clarification on some occasions. Leaders have their own authority. In principle, don't blindly say how innocent you are, you will only make yourself more and more unclear the more you talk, and let the leader use his own words to clarify for you is the best strategy.
